Phonological processing in speech perception: What do sonority differences tell us?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Previous research has associated the inferior frontal and posterior temporal brain regions with a number of phonological processes. In order to identify how these specific brain regions contribute to phonological processing, we manipulated subsyllabic phonological complexity and stimulus modality during speech perception using fMRI. Subjects passively attended to visual or auditory pseudowords. Similar to previous studies, a bilateral network of cortical regions was recruited during the presentation of visual and auditory stimuli. Moreover, pseudowords recruited a similar network of regions as words and letters. Few regions in the whole-brain results revealed neural processing differences associated with phonological complexity independent of modality of presentation. In an ROI analysis, the only region sensitive to phonological complexity was the posterior part of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFGpo), with the complexity effect only present for print. In sum, the sensitivity of phonological brain areas depends on the modality of stimulus presentation and task demands.
منابع مشابه
Filling the perceptuo-motor gap
Introduction The session under focus deals with phonetic articulatory-acoustic variation and with the link between phonetic detail and phonological modelling. The underlying question was to estimate the impact of phonetic detail on the phonological status of a given unit, and to attempt to better understand how details are produced by the speaker or exploited by the listener to access (encode o...
متن کاملDo we have innate knowledge about phonological markedness? Comments on Berent, Steriade, Lennertz, and Vaknin.
In their article ‘What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions’, Berent, Steriade, Lennertz, and Vaknin (2007) address the question of whether listeners have innate knowledge of phonological markedness. Focusing on sonority and syllable structure, they answer this question positively. SpeciWcally, they argue that English listeners’ perception of onset clusters...
متن کاملWhat is the relationship between phonological short-term memory and speech processing?
Traditionally, models of speech comprehension and production do not depend on concepts and processes from the phonological short-term memory (pSTM) literature. Likewise, in working memory research, pSTM is considered to be a language-independent system that facilitates language acquisition rather than speech processing per se. We discuss couplings between pSTM, speech perception and speech prod...
متن کاملEffects of language experience on pre-categorical perception: Distinguishing general from specialized processes in speech perception.
Cross-language differences in speech perception have traditionally been linked to phonological categories, but it has become increasingly clear that language experience has effects beginning at early stages of perception, which blurs the accepted distinctions between general and speech-specific processing. The present experiments explored this distinction by playing stimuli to English and Japan...
متن کاملWhat does Phonology tell us abo Some Reflections on the Ph
In both non-linear and non-derivational phonology, stress plays a central role in the general architecture of the theoretical model. However, while word stress is normally considered, little, if any, attention is devoted to phrasal stress as well as to linguistic rhythm. The phonological study of stress is based on an abstract and ideal view of language, which is far away from the effective pro...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Brain and language
دوره 149 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015